CSBG.NEO vs. BMAX.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) and Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO).
CSBG.NEO and BMAX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSBG.NEO is an actively managed fund by CIBC. It was launched on Jun 18, 2021. BMAX.TO is managed by Brompton Funds.
Performance
CSBG.NEO vs. BMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSBG.NEO vs. BMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.17% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF | -0.42% | 17.88% | 19.42% | 11.56% | 6.10% |
Returns By Period
CSBG.NEO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- 0.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMAX.TO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSBG.NEO vs. BMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSBG.NEO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BMAX.TO's 2.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSBG.NEO vs. BMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CSBG.NEO
BMAX.TO
CSBG.NEO vs. BMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) and Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSBG.NEO | BMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 1.21 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSBG.NEO and BMAX.TO is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CSBG.NEO vs. BMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CSBG.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.21%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 1.21% | 1.66% |
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF | 10.21% | 9.70% | 9.64% | 9.55% | 2.41% |
Drawdowns
CSBG.NEO vs. BMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSBG.NEO drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BMAX.TO drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSBG.NEO and BMAX.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSBG.NEO | BMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -15.42% | +15.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -11.30% | +11.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.91% | +5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.92% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 2.60% | -2.60% |
Volatility
CSBG.NEO vs. BMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) is 0.00%, while Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that CSBG.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSBG.NEO | BMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 5.27% | -5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 8.53% | -8.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 15.67% | -15.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.30% | 13.19% | -11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.30% | 13.19% | -11.89% |