PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO) and CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSAV.TO achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than CCOM.TO's 14.17% return.


CSAV.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.15%
6M
1.01%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.53%

CCOM.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.72%
6M
9.39%
YTD
14.17%
1Y
23.50%
3Y*
6.82%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$73.22KCA$113.43KCA$307.55K
CA$1.49MCA$1.26MCA$1.48M

CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
1.18%2.54%4.43%5.04%1.08%
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units
14.17%6.96%5.90%-2.46%1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CSAV.TO and CCOM.TO is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2022

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSAV.TO
CSAV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSAV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSAV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSAV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSAV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOM.TO
CCOM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CCOM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO) and CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSAV.TOCCOM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+16.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.54

1.38

+3.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

108.77

2.70

+106.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

301.45

7.92

+293.53

CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 8.62, which is higher than the CCOM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSAV.TO and CCOM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSAV.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.02%, smaller than the maximum CCOM.TO drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSAV.TO and CCOM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSAV.TOCCOM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-9.79%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-7.73%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.02%

-8.18%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.41%

+4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.07%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

2.70%

-2.69%

Volatility

CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO) is 0.07%, while CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that CSAV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCOM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSAV.TOCCOM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

2.70%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.18%

8.06%

-7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25%

10.24%

-9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.28%

8.45%

-8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.27%

8.45%

-8.18%

CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSAV.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSAV.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Dividend Comparison

CSAV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than CCOM.TO's 13.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CCOM.TO
CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units
13.17%3.48%6.99%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
2.16%2.53%4.40%4.90%2.15%0.57%0.89%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSAV.TO and CCOM.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CCOM.TO.

CSAV.TO is categorized as Money Market, while CCOM.TO is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CSAV.TO and 0.73% for CCOM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSAV.TO and CCOM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer