PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSAIX vs. LCSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSAIX achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly higher than LCSIX's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CSAIX has underperformed LCSIX with an annualized return of 0.50%, while LCSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.80% annualized return.


CSAIX

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
5.32%
6M
5.32%
1Y
14.43%
3Y*
-3.23%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
0.50%

LCSIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.51%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-0.64%
3Y*
-1.71%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
2.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSAIX
Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.32%-5.84%-5.57%-6.15%21.24%7.46%1.86%-4.39%-4.01%-1.47%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
1.51%1.13%-8.29%-3.07%6.04%14.90%9.90%-5.97%15.16%6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CSAIX and LCSIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2012

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSAIX vs. LCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSAIX
CSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LCSIX
LCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
LCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
LCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSAIXLCSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.98

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

-0.25

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.05

-0.50

+5.55

CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the LCSIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSAIX and LCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSAIX drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than LCSIX's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSAIX and LCSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSAIXLCSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-25.13%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

-3.87%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.02%

-11.60%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

-13.21%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.79%

-13.54%

-15.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.34%

-9.87%

-8.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-6.38%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.09%

+0.79%

Volatility

CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) at 1.21%. This indicates that CSAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSAIXLCSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

1.21%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

4.89%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.51%

6.10%

+5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.43%

5.51%

+4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.10%

6.66%

+3.44%

CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSAIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison

CSAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than LCSIX's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSAIX
Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.53%2.27%2.95%0.52%18.80%8.84%0.00%1.74%0.00%0.00%2.64%8.69%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
2.28%2.32%2.75%1.88%10.75%7.14%2.94%0.54%12.36%0.02%3.21%7.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSAIX and LCSIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSAIX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to LCSIX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSAIX dropped -28.79% vs LCSIX's -25.13%.

CSAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSAIX and LCSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer