CSAIX vs. LCSIX
CSAIX (Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and LCSIX (LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 10 years, CSAIX returned 0.50%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for LCSIX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSAIX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for LCSIX.
Performance
CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSAIX achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly higher than LCSIX's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CSAIX has underperformed LCSIX with an annualized return of 0.50%, while LCSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.80% annualized return.
CSAIX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- -3.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 0.50%
LCSIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- -1.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSAIX Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 5.32% | -5.84% | -5.57% | -6.15% | 21.24% | 7.46% | 1.86% | -4.39% | -4.01% | -1.47% |
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 1.51% | 1.13% | -8.29% | -3.07% | 6.04% | 14.90% | 9.90% | -5.97% | 15.16% | 6.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSAIX and LCSIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2012 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSAIX vs. LCSIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSAIX
LCSIX
CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSAIX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.98 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | -0.25 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | -0.50 | +5.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSAIX drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than LCSIX's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSAIX and LCSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSAIX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -25.13% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.73% | -3.87% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.02% | -11.60% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -13.21% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.79% | -13.54% | -15.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.34% | -9.87% | -8.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -6.38% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 2.09% | +0.79% |
Volatility
CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) at 1.21%. This indicates that CSAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSAIX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 1.21% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 4.89% | +5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.51% | 6.10% | +5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 5.51% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.10% | 6.66% | +3.44% |
CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSAIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSAIX vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison
CSAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than LCSIX's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSAIX Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.53% | 2.27% | 2.95% | 0.52% | 18.80% | 8.84% | 0.00% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 8.69% |
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 2.28% | 2.32% | 2.75% | 1.88% | 10.75% | 7.14% | 2.94% | 0.54% | 12.36% | 0.02% | 3.21% | 7.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSAIX and LCSIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSAIX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to LCSIX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSAIX dropped -28.79% vs LCSIX's -25.13%.
CSAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSAIX and LCSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer