PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSAIX vs. ABYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSAIX vs. ABYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSAIX achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly lower than ABYIX's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CSAIX has underperformed ABYIX with an annualized return of 0.60%, while ABYIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.54% annualized return.


CSAIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.36%
YTD
6.10%
6M
8.73%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
-3.32%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
0.60%

ABYIX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.93%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.03%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSAIX vs. ABYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSAIX
Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund
6.10%-5.84%-5.57%-6.15%21.24%7.46%1.86%-4.39%-4.01%-1.47%
ABYIX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I
7.88%1.62%1.11%-3.29%17.06%3.39%7.92%8.84%-6.15%-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CSAIX and ABYIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.80

The correlation between CSAIX and ABYIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSAIX vs. ABYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSAIX
CSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ABYIX
ABYIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ABYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ABYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSAIX vs. ABYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSAIXABYIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

5.61

-3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

15.20

-10.54

CSAIX vs. ABYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the ABYIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSAIX and ABYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSAIXABYIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.08

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.47

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.44

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.56

-0.31

Drawdowns

CSAIX vs. ABYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSAIX drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than ABYIX's maximum drawdown of -17.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSAIX and ABYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSAIXABYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-17.13%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

-2.85%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.50%

-14.00%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

-14.66%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.79%

-14.74%

-14.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.74%

-0.83%

-16.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-6.66%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.05%

+1.73%

Volatility

CSAIX vs. ABYIX - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX) at 2.10%. This indicates that CSAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSAIXABYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.10%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

5.91%

+4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

7.69%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.47%

7.99%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.08%

8.02%

+2.06%

CSAIX vs. ABYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSAIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ABYIX's 1.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSAIX vs. ABYIX - Dividend Comparison

CSAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than ABYIX's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABYIX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I
1.23%1.33%2.10%2.03%15.24%3.68%1.54%8.70%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.24%
CSAIX
Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.82%2.27%2.95%0.52%18.80%8.84%0.00%1.74%0.00%0.00%2.64%8.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSAIX and ABYIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSAIX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to ABYIX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSAIX dropped -28.79% vs ABYIX's -17.13%.

ABYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSAIX and ABYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer