PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CS51.L vs. LDEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CS51.L achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.


CS51.L

1D
0.98%
1M
2.01%
YTD
6.51%
6M
7.62%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
11.56%

LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
10.41%
6M
14.16%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CS51.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc
6.51%28.21%6.16%19.95%-3.29%4.20%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CS51.L and LDEG.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.72

The correlation between CS51.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.85 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CS51.L
LDEG.L

Financial Services

25.0%
41.5%

Industrials

21.7%
15.8%

Technology

17.6%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.1%

Healthcare

5.2%
3.4%

Energy

4.8%
7.7%

Utilities

4.5%
8.2%

Basic Materials

3.5%
9.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
5.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

CS51.L
25.0%
LDEG.L
41.5%

Industrials

CS51.L
21.7%
LDEG.L
15.8%

Technology

CS51.L
17.6%
LDEG.L
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CS51.L
9.8%
LDEG.L
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

CS51.L
5.5%
LDEG.L
3.1%

Healthcare

CS51.L
5.2%
LDEG.L
3.4%

Energy

CS51.L
4.8%
LDEG.L
7.7%

Utilities

CS51.L
4.5%
LDEG.L
8.2%

Basic Materials

CS51.L
3.5%
LDEG.L
9.9%

Communication Services

CS51.L
2.4%
LDEG.L
5.2%

Real Estate

CS51.L

-

LDEG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CS51.L
CS51.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CS51.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CS51.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CS51.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CS51.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CS51.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CS51.LLDEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.48

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.78

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

13.82

-8.31

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CS51.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CS51.L and LDEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CS51.LLDEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.63

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.24

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

1.24

-0.75

Drawdowns

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CS51.L drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS51.L and LDEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CS51.LLDEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-15.97%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.49%

-8.04%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-12.05%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

-15.97%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.33%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-2.95%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.20%

+1.23%

Volatility

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that CS51.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CS51.LLDEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

3.57%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

9.21%

+3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

11.55%

+3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

15.99%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

16.01%

+2.00%

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CS51.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CS51.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison

CS51.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CS51.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


CS51.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CS51.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CS51.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.

CS51.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CS51.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CS51.L and LDEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer