CS51.L vs. LCPE.L
CS51.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - CS51.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CS51.L returned 11.56%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CS51.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
CS51.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CS51.L achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CS51.L has outperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 11.56%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.
CS51.L
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
CS51.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS51.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc | 6.51% | 28.21% | 6.16% | 19.95% | -3.29% | 15.48% | 2.70% | 22.16% | -10.71% | 14.47% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CS51.L and LCPE.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, CS51.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
CS51.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CS51.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
CS51.L
LCPE.L
-
Industrials
CS51.L
LCPE.L
Technology
CS51.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
CS51.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
CS51.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
CS51.L
LCPE.L
Energy
CS51.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
CS51.L
LCPE.L
-
Basic Materials
CS51.L
LCPE.L
Communication Services
CS51.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
CS51.L
-
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CS51.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
CS51.L
LCPE.L
CS51.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CS51.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 4.13 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 13.66 | -8.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CS51.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 2.44 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 1.04 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 1.20 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.98 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
CS51.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CS51.L drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS51.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CS51.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -27.05% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -6.66% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -12.39% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -12.39% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -27.05% | -6.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -2.71% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -3.52% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 2.02% | +1.41% |
Volatility
CS51.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that CS51.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CS51.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 3.81% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 8.48% | +3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 11.29% | +3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 17.74% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 20.60% | -2.59% |
CS51.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CS51.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CS51.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CS51.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CS51.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CS51.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CS51.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
CS51.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CS51.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for CS51.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer