PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CS51.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CS51.L having a 6.51% return and CEUR.L slightly higher at 6.66%. Over the past 10 years, CS51.L has outperformed CEUR.L with an annualized return of 11.56%, while CEUR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.88% annualized return.


CS51.L

1D
0.98%
1M
2.01%
YTD
6.51%
6M
7.62%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
11.56%

CEUR.L

1D
0.46%
1M
1.24%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.99%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CS51.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc
6.51%28.21%6.16%19.95%-3.29%15.48%2.70%22.16%-10.71%14.47%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
6.66%24.46%4.90%12.93%-5.96%17.02%2.29%19.59%-9.49%14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CS51.L and CEUR.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.88

The correlation between CS51.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CS51.L
CEUR.L

Financial Services

25.0%
25.1%

Industrials

21.7%
19.8%

Technology

17.6%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.2%

Healthcare

5.2%
13.8%

Energy

4.8%
3.5%

Utilities

4.5%
5.3%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.8%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.4%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Financial Services

CS51.L
25.0%
CEUR.L
25.1%

Industrials

CS51.L
21.7%
CEUR.L
19.8%

Technology

CS51.L
17.6%
CEUR.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CS51.L
9.8%
CEUR.L
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

CS51.L
5.5%
CEUR.L
7.2%

Healthcare

CS51.L
5.2%
CEUR.L
13.8%

Energy

CS51.L
4.8%
CEUR.L
3.5%

Utilities

CS51.L
4.5%
CEUR.L
5.3%

Basic Materials

CS51.L
3.5%
CEUR.L
3.8%

Communication Services

CS51.L
2.4%
CEUR.L
3.4%

Real Estate

CS51.L

-

CEUR.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CS51.L
CS51.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CS51.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CS51.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CS51.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CS51.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CS51.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CS51.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.74

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

6.06

-0.54

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CS51.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CS51.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CS51.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.54

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.68

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.66

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.56

-0.06

Drawdowns

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CS51.L drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than CEUR.L's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS51.L and CEUR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CS51.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-28.63%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.49%

-11.05%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-12.66%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

-17.85%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

-28.63%

-4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.52%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-4.58%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.17%

+0.26%

Volatility

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CS51.L) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that CS51.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CS51.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.25%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

10.53%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

12.44%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

13.88%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

14.97%

+3.04%

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CS51.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CS51.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CS51.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CS51.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CS51.L.

CS51.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CS51.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CS51.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer