CRWL vs. TSDD

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CRWL (GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRWL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRWL returned 96.94% vs -58.78% for TSDD. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. CRWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.

Performance

CRWL vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWL achieves a 127.84% return, which is significantly higher than TSDD's 6.08% return.

CRWL

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 35.19%
• 6M: 145.85%
• YTD: 127.84%
• 1Y: 96.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSDD

• 1D: 5.40%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: 1.61%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 1Y: -58.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWL vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF	127.84%	30.37%	-4.49%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	6.08%	-74.84%	-35.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWL and TSDD is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024	-0.37

CRWL vs. TSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRWL	TSDD
Technology	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	200.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CRWL vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWL

CRWL Risk / Return Rank: 39
CRWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CRWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CRWL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CRWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CRWL Martin Ratio Rank: 29

TSDD

TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 4
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWL vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRWL	TSDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	-0.66	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	-0.75	+2.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.92	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	-0.85	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.06	-1.07	+4.12

CRWL vs. TSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWL Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the TSDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWL and TSDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRWL vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWL drawdown since its inception was -64.99%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWL and TSDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWL	TSDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.99%	-99.03%	+34.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.99%	-69.48%	+4.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.38%	-98.78%	+91.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.14%	-72.25%	+48.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.81%	55.19%	-23.38%

Volatility

CRWL vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) is 31.53%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 34.51%. This indicates that CRWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRWL	TSDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.53%	34.51%	-2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	80.06%	63.03%	+17.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.17%	89.27%	+5.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	97.19%	114.41%	-17.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	97.19%	114.41%	-17.22%

CRWL vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRWL vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison

CRWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	7.94%	8.42%	0.00%	24.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWL and TSDD in my portfolio?

CRWL and TSDD have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRWL or TSDD?

TSDD has higher volatility (34.51%) compared to CRWL (31.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWL dropped -64.99% vs TSDD's -99.03%.

Which ETF is better, CRWL or TSDD?

On 1-year performance, CRWL leads with 96.94% vs -58.78% for TSDD. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CRWL has been the lower-risk option at 31.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRWL or TSDD?

Over the 1-year period, CRWL has performed better with a 96.94% return vs -58.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRWL or TSDD?

TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRWL or TSDD?

TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 7.94%, compared with 0.00% for CRWL.

What is the main difference between CRWL and TSDD?

CRWL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWL and 0.95% for TSDD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.