CRWL vs. SOXL
CRWL (GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRWL is actively managed, while SOXL is passively managed. Over the past year, CRWL returned 36.17% vs 1322.96% for SOXL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
CRWL vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWL achieves a 64.57% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 615.61% return.
CRWL
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 64.57%
- 6M
- 53.40%
- 1Y
- 36.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- 7.69%
- 1M
- 57.83%
- YTD
- 615.61%
- 6M
- 595.26%
- 1Y
- 1,322.96%
- 3Y*
- 141.01%
- 5Y*
- 51.34%
- 10Y*
- 68.93%
CRWL vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF | 64.57% | 30.37% | -4.49% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 615.61% | 54.91% | -16.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWL and SOXL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024 | 0.39 |
CRWL vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CRWL
SOXL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CRWL
SOXL
Basic Materials
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Communication Services
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Energy
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Financial Services
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Utilities
CRWL
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWL vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
CRWL
SOXL
CRWL vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWL | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.65 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 30.78 | -30.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 99.38 | -98.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWL vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWL drawdown since its inception was -64.99%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWL and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWL | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.99% | -90.46% | +25.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.99% | -43.47% | -21.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -87.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.43% | 0.00% | -27.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.73% | -34.95% | +10.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.20% | 13.44% | +19.76% |
Volatility
CRWL vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) is 34.74%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 62.02%. This indicates that CRWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWL | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.74% | 62.02% | -27.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.79% | 96.02% | -20.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.28% | 114.45% | -23.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.90% | 109.85% | -13.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.90% | 100.50% | -4.60% |
CRWL vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWL vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
CRWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWL and SOXL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (62.02%) compared to CRWL (34.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWL dropped -64.99% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 1-year performance, SOXL leads with 1322.96% vs 36.17% for CRWL. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CRWL has been the lower-risk option at 34.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 1322.96% return vs 36.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWL.
SOXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for CRWL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWL and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.72 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWL and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer