CRWL vs. NTSD
CRWL (GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
CRWL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRWL
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 64.57%
- 6M
- 53.40%
- 1Y
- 36.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF | 110.87% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 18.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWL and NTSD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
CRWL
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRWL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWL drawdown since its inception was -64.99%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.99% | -5.58% | -59.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.43% | -0.88% | -26.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.73% | -1.06% | -23.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.20% | — | — |
Volatility
CRWL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.28% | 24.87% | +66.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.90% | 24.87% | +71.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.90% | 24.87% | +71.03% |
CRWL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWL.
CRWL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for CRWL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer