CRWL vs. KORU
CRWL (GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF) and KORU (Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRWL is actively managed, while KORU is passively managed. Over the past year, CRWL returned 29.68% vs 789.62% for KORU. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for KORU.
Performance
CRWL vs. KORU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWL achieves a 62.65% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 308.29% return.
CRWL
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 62.65%
- 6M
- 55.17%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KORU
- 1D
- 5.90%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- 308.29%
- 6M
- 341.55%
- 1Y
- 789.62%
- 3Y*
- 104.57%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.15%
CRWL vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF | 62.65% | 30.37% | -4.49% |
KORU Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 308.29% | 432.73% | -31.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWL and KORU is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024 | 0.31 |
CRWL vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CRWL
KORU
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CRWL
KORU
Basic Materials
CRWL
-
KORU
Communication Services
CRWL
-
KORU
Consumer Cyclical
CRWL
-
KORU
Consumer Defensive
CRWL
-
KORU
Energy
CRWL
-
KORU
Financial Services
CRWL
-
KORU
Healthcare
CRWL
-
KORU
Industrials
CRWL
-
KORU
Real Estate
CRWL
-
KORU
-
Utilities
CRWL
-
KORU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWL vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank
CRWL
KORU
CRWL vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWL | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.51 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 12.99 | -12.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 37.77 | -36.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWL vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWL drawdown since its inception was -64.99%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWL and KORU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWL | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.99% | -95.79% | +30.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.99% | -61.39% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -93.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.27% | -41.40% | +13.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.74% | -57.41% | +32.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.29% | 21.07% | +12.22% |
Volatility
CRWL vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) is 34.58%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 92.24%. This indicates that CRWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWL | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.58% | 92.24% | -57.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.79% | 138.68% | -62.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.94% | 144.21% | -53.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.69% | 91.42% | +4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.69% | 83.04% | +12.65% |
CRWL vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWL vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison
CRWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KORU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KORU Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 0.21% | 0.89% | 4.10% | 2.55% | 0.48% | 0.76% | 0.01% | 0.93% | 1.40% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWL and KORU have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KORU has higher volatility (92.24%) compared to CRWL (34.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWL dropped -64.99% vs KORU's -95.79%.
On 1-year performance, KORU leads with 789.62% vs 29.68% for CRWL. On fees, KORU is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, CRWL has been the lower-risk option at 34.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KORU has performed better with a 789.62% return vs 29.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KORU is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWL.
KORU has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.00% for CRWL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWL and 1.29% for KORU.
KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.55 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWL and KORU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer