CRWD vs. IBTA.L
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while IBTA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 24.23%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for IBTA.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRWD vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 47.82% return, which is significantly higher than IBTA.L's 0.51% return.
CRWD
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 16.64%
- YTD
- 47.82%
- 6M
- 42.14%
- 1Y
- 44.17%
- 3Y*
- 64.68%
- 5Y*
- 24.23%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- —
CRWD vs. IBTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 47.82% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
IBTA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.51% | 5.34% | 4.07% | 4.21% | -3.75% | -0.64% | 3.14% | 1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWD and IBTA.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.01 |
The correlation between CRWD and IBTA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWD vs. IBTA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CRWD
IBTA.L
CRWD vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWD | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.63 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 5.15 | -3.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.72 | 17.76 | -15.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWD vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than IBTA.L's maximum drawdown of -5.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and IBTA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWD | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -5.80% | -61.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -0.67% | -36.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.44% | -0.89% | -43.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.69% | -5.70% | -61.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.41% | 0.00% | -11.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -0.96% | -22.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 0.20% | +16.11% |
Volatility
CRWD vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 18.35% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) at 0.52%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWD | IBTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.35% | 0.52% | +17.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.68% | 1.13% | +36.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.58% | 1.58% | +44.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.79% | 2.17% | +48.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.06% | 1.93% | +54.13% |
Dividends
CRWD vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWD nor IBTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWD and IBTA.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CRWD and IBTA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer