CRVS vs. WDC
CRVS (Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and WDC (Western Digital Corporation) are both stocks. CRVS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while WDC operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CRVS returned 0.12%/yr vs 30.80%/yr for WDC. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CRVS vs. WDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRVS achieves a 72.86% return, which is significantly lower than WDC's 168.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CRVS has underperformed WDC with an annualized return of 0.12%, while WDC has yielded a comparatively higher 30.80% annualized return.
CRVS
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -39.72%
- YTD
- 72.86%
- 1Y
- 186.24%
- 3Y*
- 79.80%
- 5Y*
- 43.86%
- 10Y*
- 0.12%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.15%
WDC
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -29.12%
- 6M
- 65.31%
- YTD
- 168.41%
- 1Y
- 556.13%
- 3Y*
- 144.47%
- 5Y*
- 56.73%
- 10Y*
- 30.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.74M | $17.68M | $19.60M | |
| $3.81B | $3.93B | $4.70B |
CRVS vs. WDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRVS Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 72.86% | 43.93% | 203.98% | 107.06% | -64.73% | -32.30% | -34.56% | 48.23% | -64.58% | -27.55% |
WDC Western Digital Corporation | 168.41% | 283.68% | 13.86% | 65.99% | -51.62% | 17.73% | -10.89% | 77.14% | -51.90% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRVS and WDC is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
CRVS:
$1.12B
WDC:
$159.26B
CRVS:
-$0.52
WDC:
$25.88
CRVS:
$0.00
WDC:
$11.78B
CRVS:
-$26.00K
WDC:
$5.35B
CRVS:
-$47.43M
WDC:
$10.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRVS vs. WDC — Risk / Return Rank
CRVS
WDC
CRVS vs. WDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) and Western Digital Corporation (WDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRVS | WDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.61 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 14.73 | -11.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 53.48 | -47.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRVS vs. WDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRVS drawdown since its inception was -96.97%, roughly equal to the maximum WDC drawdown of -96.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRVS and WDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRVS | WDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.97% | -96.20% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.43% | -38.08% | -18.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.50% | -49.65% | -20.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.40% | -56.06% | -36.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.97% | -70.49% | -26.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.84% | -38.08% | -9.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.00% | -51.97% | -17.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.19% | 10.47% | +19.72% |
Volatility
CRVS vs. WDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) is 16.72%, while Western Digital Corporation (WDC) has a volatility of 27.55%. This indicates that CRVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRVS | WDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.72% | 27.55% | -10.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.27% | 60.65% | -11.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 179.57% | 75.98% | +103.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 131.13% | 51.65% | +79.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 111.24% | 49.66% | +61.58% |
Dividends
CRVS vs. WDC - Dividend Comparison
CRVS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRVS Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDC Western Digital Corporation | 0.11% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.81% | 2.36% | 5.41% | 2.51% | 2.94% | 3.33% |
Financials
CRVS vs. WDC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Western Digital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRVS and WDC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDC has higher volatility (27.55%) compared to CRVS (16.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRVS dropped -96.97% vs WDC's -96.20%.
WDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.39 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRVS and WDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer