CRSR vs. SONO
CRSR (Corsair Gaming, Inc.) and SONO (Sonos, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CRSR in Computer Hardware, SONO in Consumer Electronics. Over the past 5 years, CRSR returned -19.45%/yr vs -13.94%/yr for SONO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRSR vs. SONO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSR achieves a 94.11% return, which is significantly higher than SONO's -6.21% return.
CRSR
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 65.66%
- YTD
- 94.11%
- 6M
- 78.48%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- -16.61%
- 5Y*
- -19.45%
- 10Y*
- —
SONO
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- -6.21%
- 6M
- -12.30%
- 1Y
- 63.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- -13.94%
- 10Y*
- —
CRSR vs. SONO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSR Corsair Gaming, Inc. | 94.11% | -10.14% | -53.12% | 3.91% | -35.41% | -41.99% | 154.18% |
SONO Sonos, Inc. | -6.21% | 16.76% | -12.25% | 1.42% | -43.29% | 27.40% | 59.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSR and SONO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.47 |
Fundamentals
CRSR:
$0.04
SONO:
-$0.45
CRSR:
0.85
SONO:
1.03
CRSR:
$1.46B
SONO:
$1.46B
CRSR:
$439.55M
SONO:
$653.62M
CRSR:
$57.42M
SONO:
-$2.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSR vs. SONO — Risk / Return Rank
CRSR
SONO
CRSR vs. SONO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corsair Gaming, Inc. (CRSR) and Sonos, Inc. (SONO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRSR | SONO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | 1.57 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 2.22 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 1.79 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 3.95 | -2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRSR | SONO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 1.57 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | -0.30 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | -0.04 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
CRSR vs. SONO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSR drawdown since its inception was -91.07%, which is greater than SONO's maximum drawdown of -82.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSR and SONO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSR | SONO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.07% | -82.46% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.07% | -33.72% | -19.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.96% | -60.53% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.28% | -81.36% | -5.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.51% | -62.47% | -15.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.01% | -49.54% | -17.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.59% | 15.23% | +14.36% |
Volatility
CRSR vs. SONO - Volatility Comparison
Corsair Gaming, Inc. (CRSR) has a higher volatility of 33.57% compared to Sonos, Inc. (SONO) at 12.23%. This indicates that CRSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SONO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSR | SONO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.57% | 12.23% | +21.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.24% | 26.99% | +36.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.70% | 40.50% | +38.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.03% | 47.05% | +11.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.34% | 54.02% | +7.32% |
Dividends
CRSR vs. SONO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRSR nor SONO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRSR vs. SONO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corsair Gaming, Inc. and Sonos, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRSR vs. SONO - Profitability Comparison
CRSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corsair Gaming, Inc. reported a gross profit of 116.03M and revenue of 354.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
SONO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonos, Inc. reported a gross profit of 124.65M and revenue of 281.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.
CRSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corsair Gaming, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.80M and revenue of 354.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.
SONO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonos, Inc. reported an operating income of -34.09M and revenue of 281.53M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.1%.
CRSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corsair Gaming, Inc. reported a net income of 11.86M and revenue of 354.51M, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
SONO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonos, Inc. reported a net income of -93.80M and revenue of 281.53M, resulting in a net margin of -33.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRSR and SONO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSR has higher volatility (33.57%) compared to SONO (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSR dropped -91.07% vs SONO's -82.46%.
SONO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRSR and SONO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer