CRQ.NEO vs. XSP.TO
CRQ.NEO (iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF) and XSP.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - CRQ.NEO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Canada Index, while XSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CRQ.NEO returned 13.44%/yr vs 13.79%/yr for XSP.TO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRQ.NEO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XSP.TO.
Performance
CRQ.NEO vs. XSP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRQ.NEO achieves a 15.93% return, which is significantly higher than XSP.TO's 9.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CRQ.NEO having a 13.44% annualized return and XSP.TO not far ahead at 13.79%.
CRQ.NEO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 15.93%
- 6M
- 18.90%
- 1Y
- 42.87%
- 3Y*
- 26.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
XSP.TO
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 25.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
CRQ.NEO vs. XSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRQ.NEO iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF | 15.93% | 31.87% | 22.17% | 9.76% | 0.89% | 33.95% | -2.73% | 19.66% | -10.18% | 6.98% |
XSP.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 9.64% | 15.68% | 23.39% | 24.33% | -19.32% | 27.85% | 15.17% | 29.35% | -6.26% | 20.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRQ.NEO and XSP.TO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CRQ.NEO and XSP.TO has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRQ.NEO vs. XSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CRQ.NEO
XSP.TO
CRQ.NEO vs. XSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRQ.NEO | XSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.41 | 2.15 | +2.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.17 | 2.96 | +3.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.00 | 1.39 | +0.62 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.30 | 2.68 | +3.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.78 | 12.40 | +18.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRQ.NEO | XSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41 | 2.15 | +2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.43 | 0.73 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.76 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.37 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
CRQ.NEO vs. XSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRQ.NEO drawdown since its inception was -41.75%, smaller than the maximum XSP.TO drawdown of -57.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRQ.NEO and XSP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRQ.NEO | XSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.75% | -57.82% | +16.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -9.41% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.70% | -18.77% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.82% | -25.44% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.75% | -36.05% | -5.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.73% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -12.11% | +6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 2.03% | -0.63% |
Volatility
CRQ.NEO vs. XSP.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO) is 2.99%, while iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that CRQ.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRQ.NEO | XSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 3.25% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 8.99% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.76% | 11.75% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.41% | 16.75% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 18.19% | -1.92% |
CRQ.NEO vs. XSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRQ.NEO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than XSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRQ.NEO vs. XSP.TO - Dividend Comparison
CRQ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than XSP.TO's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRQ.NEO iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF | 1.90% | 2.18% | 2.72% | 2.97% | 2.90% | 2.17% | 2.98% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 1.91% | 1.89% | 3.09% |
XSP.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.09% | 1.18% | 1.37% | 1.00% | 1.31% | 1.73% | 1.84% | 1.47% | 1.75% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRQ.NEO and XSP.TO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for CRQ.NEO.
CRQ.NEO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XSP.TO is S&P 500. CRQ.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Canada Index, while XSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for CRQ.NEO and 0.09% for XSP.TO.
Find the right allocation for CRQ.NEO and XSP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer