CRQ.NEO vs. TUSB
CRQ.NEO (iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF) and TUSB (Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRQ.NEO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Canada Index, while TUSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Thrivent. CRQ.NEO is passively managed, while TUSB is actively managed. Over the past year, CRQ.NEO returned 44.45% vs 6.72% for TUSB. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. CRQ.NEO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TUSB.
Performance
CRQ.NEO vs. TUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRQ.NEO is traded in CAD, while TUSB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TUSB values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRQ.NEO achieves a 17.22% return, which is significantly higher than TUSB's 3.37% return.
CRQ.NEO
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 17.22%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 44.45%
- 3Y*
- 26.75%
- 5Y*
- 17.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
TUSB
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 3.37%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 6.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRQ.NEO vs. TUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRQ.NEO iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF | 17.22% | 28.47% |
TUSB Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF | 3.37% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRQ.NEO and TUSB is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRQ.NEO vs. TUSB — Risk / Return Rank
CRQ.NEO
TUSB
CRQ.NEO vs. TUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO) and Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRQ.NEO | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.03 | 1.26 | +0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.53 | 1.89 | +4.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.92 | 5.24 | +26.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRQ.NEO | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55 | 1.44 | +3.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.55 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
CRQ.NEO vs. TUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRQ.NEO drawdown since its inception was -41.75%, which is greater than TUSB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRQ.NEO and TUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRQ.NEO | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.75% | -5.24% | -36.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -3.56% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -2.04% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 1.28% | +0.12% |
Volatility
CRQ.NEO vs. TUSB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) at 0.67%. This indicates that CRQ.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRQ.NEO | TUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 0.67% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.07% | 3.48% | +4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.81% | 4.70% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 5.38% | +7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 5.38% | +10.89% |
CRQ.NEO vs. TUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRQ.NEO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than TUSB's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRQ.NEO vs. TUSB - Dividend Comparison
CRQ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than TUSB's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRQ.NEO iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF | 1.87% | 2.18% | 2.72% | 2.97% | 2.90% | 2.17% | 2.98% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 1.91% | 1.89% | 3.09% |
TUSB Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.26% | 3.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRQ.NEO and TUSB have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TUSB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TUSB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for CRQ.NEO.
CRQ.NEO is categorized as Canada Equities, while TUSB is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for CRQ.NEO and 0.20% for TUSB.
Find the right allocation for CRQ.NEO and TUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer