CRPX.L vs. SUKC.L
CRPX.L (Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc) and SUKC.L (SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - CRPX.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR while SUKC.L tracks the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CRPX.L returned -0.70%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for SUKC.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRPX.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SUKC.L.
Performance
CRPX.L vs. SUKC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRPX.L is traded in GBp, while SUKC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SUKC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRPX.L achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than SUKC.L's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CRPX.L has underperformed SUKC.L with an annualized return of -0.70%, while SUKC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 2.42% annualized return.
CRPX.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- -0.70%
SUKC.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.59%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
CRPX.L vs. SUKC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPX.L Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc | -0.23% | 8.33% | -0.65% | 4.98% | -8.55% | -7.58% | 8.23% | 0.81% | -11.73% | 1.12% |
SUKC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 1.35% | 6.37% | 4.84% | 7.17% | -5.78% | -0.79% | 3.08% | 4.66% | -0.45% | 1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRPX.L and SUKC.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2014 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CRPX.L and SUKC.L has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRPX.L vs. SUKC.L — Risk / Return Rank
CRPX.L
SUKC.L
CRPX.L vs. SUKC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (CRPX.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRPX.L | SUKC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 2.21 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 5.26 | -3.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRPX.L vs. SUKC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRPX.L drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, which is greater than SUKC.L's maximum drawdown of -11.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPX.L and SUKC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRPX.L | SUKC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.36% | -11.60% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.94% | -2.07% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.94% | -2.07% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.71% | -11.60% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.36% | -11.60% | -11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.95% | -0.10% | -8.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -1.30% | -4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 0.87% | +0.75% |
Volatility
CRPX.L vs. SUKC.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (CRPX.L) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) at 1.03%. This indicates that CRPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUKC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRPX.L | SUKC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 1.03% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.61% | 3.74% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.67% | 6.09% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.19% | 4.55% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.41% | 4.52% | +2.89% |
CRPX.L vs. SUKC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRPX.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SUKC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CRPX.L vs. SUKC.L - Dividend Comparison
CRPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SUKC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPX.L Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUKC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.66% | 4.61% | 4.41% | 3.05% | 1.76% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.93% | 1.88% | 2.43% | 2.40% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRPX.L and SUKC.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRPX.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRPX.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUKC.L.
CRPX.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while SUKC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CRPX.L and 0.20% for SUKC.L.
Find the right allocation for CRPX.L and SUKC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer