PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Corporate Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (CRPU.L) and Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PLAN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CRPU.L is traded in USD, while PLAN.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PLAN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRPU.L achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than PLAN.L's -1.85% return.


CRPU.L

1D
0.24%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.85%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*

PLAN.L

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
-1.85%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CRPU.L
iShares Global Corporate Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF
0.72%6.46%4.01%8.64%-14.11%-1.33%
PLAN.L
Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
-1.85%29.14%-6.19%13.91%-22.64%-8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CRPU.L and PLAN.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRPU.L
CRPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CRPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CRPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

PLAN.L
PLAN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PLAN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLAN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (CRPU.L) and Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PLAN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRPU.LPLAN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.09

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

0.60

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

1.55

+4.68

CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the PLAN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRPU.L and PLAN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRPU.LPLAN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

0.49

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.06

+0.51

Drawdowns

CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRPU.L drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, smaller than the maximum PLAN.L drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPU.L and PLAN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRPU.LPLAN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.78%

-41.90%

+22.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-9.37%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.30%

-14.68%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-5.86%

+5.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-18.50%

+13.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

3.66%

-2.84%

Volatility

CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Corporate Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (CRPU.L) is 1.59%, while Lyxor Corporate Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PLAN.L) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that CRPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLAN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRPU.LPLAN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

2.91%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

8.22%

-5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

11.54%

-7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

14.59%

-8.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.61%

14.59%

-8.98%

CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRPU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PLAN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CRPU.L vs. PLAN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRPU.L nor PLAN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CRPU.L and PLAN.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PLAN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLAN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CRPU.L.

CRPU.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD, while PLAN.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CRPU.L and 0.20% for PLAN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRPU.L and PLAN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer