CRMX vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CRMX (Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - CRMX tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML) while MVLL tracks the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). Both are passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.

Performance

CRMX vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRMX

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: -42.96%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 3.74%
• 1M: 48.86%
• YTD: 621.98%
• 6M: 595.95%
• 1Y: 598.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMX vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRMX Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-84.20%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	664.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMX and MVLL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.34

Return for Risk

CRMX vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 93
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMX vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRMX	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.18	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.49	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.48	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	12.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	24.79	—

Drawdowns

CRMX vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMX drawdown since its inception was -92.84%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMX and MVLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMX	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.84%	-59.02%	-33.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.03%	-30.06%	-60.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-76.95%	-22.46%	-54.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	24.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMX	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	86.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	113.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	279.90%	144.62%	+135.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	279.90%	146.85%	+133.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	279.90%	146.85%	+133.05%

CRMX vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMX vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMX nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMX and MVLL in my portfolio?

CRMX and MVLL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMX or MVLL?

On fees, CRMX is cheaper at 1.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMX or MVLL?

CRMX is cheaper with a 1.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMX or MVLL?

CRMX and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRMX and MVLL?

CRMX tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CRMX and 1.50% for MVLL.