CRMX vs. ADBG
CRMX (Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRMX is passively managed, while ADBG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. CRMX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ADBG.
Performance
CRMX vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRMX
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -42.96%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADBG
- 1D
- -3.61%
- 1M
- -37.91%
- YTD
- -73.87%
- 6M
- -74.40%
- 1Y
- -80.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMX vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRMX Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -84.20% |
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | -69.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMX and ADBG is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMX vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank
CRMX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ADBG
CRMX vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRMX | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.70 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRMX vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMX drawdown since its inception was -92.84%, which is greater than ADBG's maximum drawdown of -84.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMX and ADBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMX | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.84% | -84.14% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -81.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.03% | -84.14% | -6.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.95% | -43.31% | -33.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 47.64% | — |
Volatility
CRMX vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMX | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 59.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 279.90% | 69.25% | +210.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 279.90% | 68.58% | +211.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 279.90% | 68.58% | +211.32% |
CRMX vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ADBG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMX vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRMX nor ADBG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMX and ADBG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ADBG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ADBG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CRMX.
CRMX and ADBG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CRMX and 0.75% for ADBG.
Find the right allocation for CRMX and ADBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer