PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMVX vs. BWDTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMVX vs. BWDTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) and Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMVX achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than BWDTX's 1.58% return.


CRMVX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
2.01%
6M
2.34%
1Y
8.54%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*

BWDTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.58%
6M
2.18%
1Y
6.14%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMVX vs. BWDTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRMVX
Potomac Managed Volatility Fund
2.01%4.91%1.22%0.25%4.76%0.61%3.98%
BWDTX
Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund
1.58%7.14%4.92%9.80%-3.16%2.32%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMVX and BWDTX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020

0.32

The correlation between CRMVX and BWDTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMVX vs. BWDTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMVX
CRMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CRMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BWDTX
BWDTX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BWDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BWDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMVX vs. BWDTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) and Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMVXBWDTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

4.78

-2.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

8.11

-5.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

2.42

-0.98

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.34

6.17

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.70

31.25

-14.56

CRMVX vs. BWDTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the BWDTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMVX and BWDTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMVXBWDTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

4.78

-2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

1.92

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

1.80

-1.80

Drawdowns

CRMVX vs. BWDTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMVX drawdown since its inception was -97.39%, which is greater than BWDTX's maximum drawdown of -10.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMVX and BWDTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMVXBWDTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.39%

-10.06%

-87.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-1.00%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.39%

-2.21%

-95.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.39%

-6.35%

-91.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.10%

0.00%

-97.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.20%

-0.68%

-23.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.20%

+0.32%

Volatility

CRMVX vs. BWDTX - Volatility Comparison

Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund (BWDTX) at 0.43%. This indicates that CRMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWDTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMVXBWDTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.43%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

1.03%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

1.29%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,597.76%

2.21%

+1,595.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,469.00%

2.21%

+1,466.79%

CRMVX vs. BWDTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMVX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than BWDTX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMVX vs. BWDTX - Dividend Comparison

CRMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, which matches BWDTX's 5.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BWDTX
Boyd Watterson Limited Duration Enhanced Income Fund
5.65%5.70%4.13%5.51%3.80%3.20%3.18%3.47%4.18%2.90%1.35%
CRMVX
Potomac Managed Volatility Fund
5.64%5.75%3.75%2.74%0.57%2.59%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRMVX and BWDTX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRMVX has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to BWDTX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMVX dropped -97.39% vs BWDTX's -10.06%.

BWDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMVX and BWDTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer