PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMEX vs. DNLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMEX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRM All Cap Value Fund (CRMEX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMEX achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly higher than DNLDX's 15.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CRMEX having a 10.05% annualized return and DNLDX not far ahead at 10.16%.


CRMEX

1D
1.99%
1M
-1.08%
6M
12.76%
YTD
18.27%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
7.71%

DNLDX

1D
1.17%
1M
1.32%
6M
12.44%
YTD
15.76%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
10.16%
ALL TIME*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CRMEX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRMEX
CRM All Cap Value Fund
18.27%11.04%15.55%5.43%-9.73%21.44%14.59%22.36%-13.87%18.55%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
15.76%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMEX and DNLDX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2006

0.93

The correlation between CRMEX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMEX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRMEX
CRMEX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CRMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRMEX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM All Cap Value Fund (CRMEX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRMEXDNLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.03

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

11.33

-1.60

CRMEX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMEX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRMEX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMEX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMEX and DNLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMEXDNLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.72%

-63.69%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-7.29%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.73%

-20.42%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.73%

-23.42%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.66%

-42.23%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

0.00%

-4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-9.60%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

1.95%

+1.62%

Volatility

CRMEX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

CRM All Cap Value Fund (CRMEX) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) at 2.97%. This indicates that CRMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMEXDNLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

2.97%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.21%

10.05%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.37%

13.46%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

18.50%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.63%

19.46%

+1.17%

CRMEX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMEX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMEX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

CRMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, less than DNLDX's 12.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRMEX
CRM All Cap Value Fund
8.02%9.49%11.02%1.92%7.25%22.91%2.70%6.13%26.31%16.83%4.64%29.97%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
12.98%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CRMEX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CRMEX has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to DNLDX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMEX dropped -53.72% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

CRMEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMEX and DNLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer