PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMEX vs. BTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMEX vs. BTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRM All Cap Value Fund (CRMEX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMEX achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than BTMFX's 1.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CRMEX having a 10.16% annualized return and BTMFX not far behind at 10.08%.


CRMEX

1D
2.40%
1M
5.46%
YTD
16.69%
6M
18.57%
1Y
39.53%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
10.16%

BTMFX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.74%
YTD
1.92%
6M
1.46%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMEX vs. BTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRMEX
CRM All Cap Value Fund
16.69%11.04%15.55%5.43%-9.73%21.44%14.59%22.36%-13.87%18.55%
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
1.92%4.29%10.27%13.06%-10.91%24.77%9.72%33.00%-3.36%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMEX and BTMFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007

0.91

The correlation between CRMEX and BTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMEX vs. BTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMEX
CRMEX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CRMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BTMFX
BTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMEX vs. BTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM All Cap Value Fund (CRMEX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMEXBTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.10

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.84

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.54

2.35

+10.19

CRMEX vs. BTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the BTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMEX and BTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMEXBTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

0.56

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.36

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.58

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.48

-0.11

Drawdowns

CRMEX vs. BTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMEX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, which is greater than BTMFX's maximum drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMEX and BTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMEXBTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.72%

-49.26%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-7.79%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.73%

-17.77%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.73%

-20.79%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.66%

-37.14%

-5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.54%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-6.16%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.80%

+0.54%

Volatility

CRMEX vs. BTMFX - Volatility Comparison

CRM All Cap Value Fund (CRMEX) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX) at 2.88%. This indicates that CRMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMEXBTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

2.88%

+3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.00%

7.99%

+7.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

11.80%

+7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

15.75%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.57%

17.44%

+3.13%

CRMEX vs. BTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMEX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than BTMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMEX vs. BTMFX - Dividend Comparison

CRMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, less than BTMFX's 10.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
10.66%10.86%4.23%4.41%4.71%4.91%1.98%6.95%5.96%6.61%7.03%6.60%
CRMEX
CRM All Cap Value Fund
8.13%9.49%11.02%1.92%7.25%22.91%2.70%6.13%26.31%16.83%4.64%29.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRMEX and BTMFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRMEX has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to BTMFX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMEX dropped -53.72% vs BTMFX's -49.26%.

CRMEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMEX and BTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer