PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMAX vs. ATGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (CRMAX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRMAX

1D
-1.34%
1M
6.46%
YTD
17.21%
6M
16.67%
1Y
35.96%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
11.00%

ATGAX

1D
-0.36%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRMAX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMAX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMAX
CRMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CRMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ATGAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (CRMAX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMAXATGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.85

CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMAXATGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

18.80

-18.33

Drawdowns

CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMAX drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMAX and ATGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMAXATGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.36%

-0.36%

-49.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.36%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-0.09%

-7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

Volatility

CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMAXATGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

11.18%

+8.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.10%

11.18%

+8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

11.18%

+9.56%

CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

CRMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRMAX
CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
4.46%5.23%15.07%0.64%6.41%35.31%5.86%2.68%18.13%29.30%2.13%12.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, CRMAX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMAX and ATGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer