CRMAX vs. ATGAX
CRMAX (CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CRMAX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRMAX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 35.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
ATGAX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRMAX CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | -0.00% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMAX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMAX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
CRMAX
ATGAX
CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (CRMAX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRMAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRMAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 18.80 | -18.33 |
Drawdowns
CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMAX drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMAX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.36% | -0.36% | -49.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -0.36% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -0.09% | -7.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | — | — |
Volatility
CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMAX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 11.18% | +8.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 11.18% | +8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 11.18% | +9.56% |
CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMAX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
CRMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRMAX CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 4.46% | 5.23% | 15.07% | 0.64% | 6.41% | 35.31% | 5.86% | 2.68% | 18.13% | 29.30% | 2.13% | 12.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, CRMAX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for CRMAX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer