PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CREMX vs. VRTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CREMX vs. VRTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) and Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CREMX vs. VRTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CREMX
Redwood Real Estate Income Fund
1.28%7.72%8.09%1.95%
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
1.31%2.22%3.72%12.00%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CREMX having a 1.28% return and VRTPX slightly higher at 1.31%.


CREMX

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.28%
6M
3.22%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VRTPX

1D
1.52%
1M
-6.59%
YTD
1.31%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
1.80%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CREMX vs. VRTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CREMX has a 5.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTPX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CREMX vs. VRTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CREMX
CREMX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CREMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CREMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CREMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CREMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CREMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTPX
VRTPX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VRTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CREMX vs. VRTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) and Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CREMXVRTPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

9.78

0.12

+9.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

12.29

0.27

+12.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

11.91

1.04

+10.87

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.82

0.22

+12.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

85.27

0.88

+84.39

CREMX vs. VRTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CREMX Sharpe Ratio is 9.78, which is higher than the VRTPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CREMX and VRTPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CREMXVRTPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78

0.12

+9.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.88

0.21

+7.66

Correlation

The correlation between CREMX and VRTPX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

CREMX vs. VRTPX - Dividend Comparison

CREMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than VRTPX's 3.85% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CREMX
Redwood Real Estate Income Fund
6.69%7.38%7.64%1.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRTPX
Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund
3.85%2.79%3.80%3.93%4.52%2.58%3.92%3.50%4.77%1.32%

Drawdowns

CREMX vs. VRTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CREMX drawdown since its inception was -0.71%, smaller than the maximum VRTPX drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CREMX and VRTPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CREMXVRTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-42.33%

+41.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.55%

-12.41%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-10.22%

+9.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-11.55%

+11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

3.18%

-3.10%

Volatility

CREMX vs. VRTPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) is 0.59%, while Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that CREMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CREMXVRTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

4.52%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.65%

9.25%

-8.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89%

16.36%

-15.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.96%

18.90%

-17.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.96%

21.92%

-20.96%