PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CREMX vs. QREARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CREMX vs. QREARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CREMX vs. QREARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CREMX
Redwood Real Estate Income Fund
1.87%7.64%
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.61%3.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CREMX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than QREARX's 0.61% return.


CREMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.87%
6M
3.82%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QREARX

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.59%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CREMX vs. QREARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CREMX has a 5.16% expense ratio, which is higher than QREARX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CREMX vs. QREARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CREMX
CREMX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CREMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CREMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CREMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CREMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CREMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

QREARX
QREARX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
QREARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QREARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
QREARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QREARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QREARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CREMX vs. QREARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CREMXQREARXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

17.80

4.68

+13.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

149.33

7.19

+142.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

107.09

2.64

+104.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

16.16

9.85

+6.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

101.62

40.12

+61.50

CREMX vs. QREARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CREMX Sharpe Ratio is 17.80, which is higher than the QREARX Sharpe Ratio of 4.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CREMX and QREARX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CREMXQREARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80

4.68

+13.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.80

2.12

+6.68

Correlation

The correlation between CREMX and QREARX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CREMX vs. QREARX - Dividend Comparison

CREMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, while QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
CREMX
Redwood Real Estate Income Fund
7.28%7.38%7.64%1.98%
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CREMX vs. QREARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CREMX drawdown since its inception was -0.71%, smaller than the maximum QREARX drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CREMX and QREARX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CREMXQREARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-1.45%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.04%

-0.37%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-0.05%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.09%

-0.01%

Volatility

CREMX vs. QREARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) is 0.11%, while TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) has a volatility of 0.30%. This indicates that CREMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QREARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CREMXQREARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

0.30%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.29%

0.46%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43%

0.77%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.89%

1.76%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.89%

1.76%

-0.87%