CREEX vs. AWP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CREEX (Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund) and AWP (abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 10 years, CREEX returned 5.95%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for AWP. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CREEX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for AWP.

Performance

CREEX vs. AWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund (CREEX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CREEX achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than AWP's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CREEX has underperformed AWP with an annualized return of 5.95%, while AWP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.71% annualized return.

CREEX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 12.06%
• 6M: 11.05%
• 1Y: 12.73%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 5.95%

AWP

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -3.34%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: 12.51%
• 5Y*: -0.49%
• 10Y*: 6.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CREEX vs. AWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CREEX Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund	12.06%	0.19%	7.40%	16.20%	-25.10%	41.91%	-3.54%	28.40%	-7.21%	4.56%
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund	3.18%	12.43%	12.23%	12.58%	-37.13%	40.41%	-10.29%	42.52%	-18.47%	44.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CREEX and AWP is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2007	0.60

The correlation between CREEX and AWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CREEX vs. AWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CREEX

CREEX Risk / Return Rank: 14
CREEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CREEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CREEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CREEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CREEX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

AWP

AWP Risk / Return Rank: 6
AWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
AWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
AWP Omega Ratio Rank: 6
AWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
AWP Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CREEX vs. AWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund (CREEX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CREEX	AWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	0.53	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	0.83	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.10	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	0.53	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.62	2.15	+2.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CREEX vs. AWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CREEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the AWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CREEX and AWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CREEX	AWP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	0.53	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	-0.02	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.28	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.06	+0.33

Drawdowns

CREEX vs. AWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CREEX drawdown since its inception was -70.78%, smaller than the maximum AWP drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CREEX and AWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CREEX	AWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.78%	-85.93%	+15.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.94%	-14.14%	+6.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.89%	-23.09%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.25%	-43.93%	+12.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.42%	-53.95%	+12.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.25%	-7.85%	+4.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.72%	-27.39%	+16.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.46%	-0.80%

Volatility

CREEX vs. AWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund (CREEX) is 4.02%, while abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that CREEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CREEX	AWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	4.42%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	11.12%	-1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.70%	14.00%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	22.16%	-3.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.66%	23.63%	-2.97%

CREEX vs. AWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CREEX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than AWP's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CREEX vs. AWP - Dividend Comparison

CREEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than AWP's 12.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund	12.74%	12.50%	12.44%	12.37%	12.31%	7.02%	9.13%	8.49%	12.05%	8.90%	11.70%	10.40%
CREEX Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund	5.59%	6.26%	10.13%	32.32%	5.92%	6.41%	7.50%	12.02%	8.22%	14.73%	4.23%	8.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CREEX and AWP in my portfolio?

CREEX and AWP have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CREEX or AWP?

AWP has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to CREEX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CREEX dropped -70.78% vs AWP's -85.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CREEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.