PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRED vs. RSPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRED vs. RSPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRED achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly higher than RSPR's 7.75% return.


CRED

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.65%
YTD
12.18%
6M
12.65%
1Y
8.89%
3Y*
8.84%
5Y*
10Y*

RSPR

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.06%
YTD
7.75%
6M
8.11%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
6.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRED vs. RSPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CRED
Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF
12.18%-2.30%5.21%13.18%
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
7.75%-1.88%8.61%13.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CRED and RSPR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023

0.92

The correlation between CRED and RSPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRED vs. RSPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CRED
RSPR

Real Estate

99.3%
96.9%

Financial Services

0.5%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

3.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

CRED
99.3%
RSPR
96.9%

Financial Services

CRED
0.5%
RSPR
0.0%

Basic Materials

CRED

-

RSPR
3.1%

Communication Services

CRED

-

RSPR

-

Consumer Cyclical

CRED

-

RSPR

-

Consumer Defensive

CRED

-

RSPR

-

Energy

CRED

-

RSPR

-

Healthcare

CRED

-

RSPR

-

Industrials

CRED

-

RSPR

-

Technology

CRED

-

RSPR

-

Utilities

CRED

-

RSPR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRED vs. RSPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRED
CRED Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CRED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRED Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRED Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CRED Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRED Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPR
RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRED vs. RSPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CREDRSPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.08

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

0.65

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

1.44

+0.98

CRED vs. RSPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRED Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the RSPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRED and RSPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CREDRSPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

0.40

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.30

+0.26

Drawdowns

CRED vs. RSPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRED drawdown since its inception was -17.59%, smaller than the maximum RSPR drawdown of -41.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRED and RSPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CREDRSPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.59%

-41.96%

+24.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-8.71%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.59%

-17.78%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-4.30%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-9.40%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

3.94%

-0.26%

Volatility

CRED vs. RSPR - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) have volatilities of 3.76% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CREDRSPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

3.69%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

9.86%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

14.02%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

19.09%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

21.37%

-5.13%

CRED vs. RSPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRED has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPR's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRED vs. RSPR - Dividend Comparison

CRED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than RSPR's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRED
Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF
4.54%5.50%4.82%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
2.68%2.70%2.58%2.91%3.14%2.56%3.82%2.48%3.02%3.01%2.06%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRED and RSPR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRED has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to RSPR (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRED dropped -17.59% vs RSPR's -41.96%.

On 3-year performance, RSPR leads with 8.85% vs 8.84% for CRED. On fees, CRED is cheaper at 0.33% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RSPR has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRED is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.

CRED has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.68% for RSPR.

CRED tracks Beta Advantage Lionstone Research Enhanced REIT Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC. They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CRED and 0.40% for RSPR.

CRED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRED and RSPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer