CRED vs. RSPR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CRED (Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF) and RSPR (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - CRED tracks the Beta Advantage Lionstone Research Enhanced REIT Index - Benchmark TR Gross while RSPR tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CRED returned 11.05%/yr vs 10.36%/yr for RSPR. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRED charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPR.

Performance

CRED vs. RSPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRED achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly higher than RSPR's 10.68% return.

CRED

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 16.23%
• 6M: 17.22%
• 1Y: 10.72%
• 3Y*: 11.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPR

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 10.68%
• 6M: 11.84%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: 10.36%
• 5Y*: 2.90%
• 10Y*: 6.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRED vs. RSPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CRED Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF	16.23%	-2.30%	5.21%	12.70%
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF	10.68%	-1.88%	8.61%	13.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CRED and RSPR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2023	0.92

The correlation between CRED and RSPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRED vs. RSPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRED

CRED Risk / Return Rank: 24
CRED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CRED Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CRED Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CRED Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CRED Martin Ratio Rank: 24

RSPR

RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 16
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRED vs. RSPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRED	RSPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.45	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	0.71	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.09	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	0.75	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.92	1.65	+1.27

CRED vs. RSPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRED Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the RSPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRED and RSPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRED vs. RSPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRED drawdown since its inception was -17.59%, smaller than the maximum RSPR drawdown of -41.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRED and RSPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRED	RSPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.59%	-41.96%	+24.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.32%	-8.71%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.59%	-17.78%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-1.70%	+1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.56%	-9.36%	+3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	3.95%	-0.27%

Volatility

CRED vs. RSPR - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRED	RSPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	4.92%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.04%	10.57%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.36%	14.59%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	19.13%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	21.42%	-5.14%

CRED vs. RSPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRED has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRED vs. RSPR - Dividend Comparison

CRED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than RSPR's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRED Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF	4.38%	5.50%	4.82%	2.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF	2.84%	2.70%	2.58%	2.91%	3.14%	2.56%	3.82%	2.48%	3.02%	3.01%	2.06%	1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRED and RSPR in my portfolio?

CRED and RSPR have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRED or RSPR?

RSPR has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to CRED (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRED dropped -17.59% vs RSPR's -41.96%.

Which ETF is better, CRED or RSPR?

On 3-year performance, CRED leads with 11.05% vs 10.36% for RSPR. On fees, CRED is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CRED has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRED or RSPR?

Over the 3-year period, CRED has performed better with a 11.05% return vs 10.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRED or RSPR?

CRED is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRED or RSPR?

CRED has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.84% for RSPR.

What is the main difference between CRED and RSPR?

CRED tracks Beta Advantage Lionstone Research Enhanced REIT Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC. They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CRED and 0.40% for RSPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.