PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

CRED.AX (Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and PLUS.AX (VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - CRED.AX tracks the Solactive Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond Select TR Index while PLUS.AX tracks the VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CRED.AX returned 0.47%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for PLUS.AX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (CRED.AX) and VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF (PLUS.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRED.AX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than PLUS.AX's 1.15% return.

CRED.AX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.08%
6M
0.11%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
—

PLUS.AX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.27%
6M
0.67%
YTD
1.15%
1Y
1.90%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CRED.AX
Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF		0.80%4.54%6.26%10.78%-14.47%-3.35%7.78%11.29%3.70%
PLUS.AX
VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF		1.15%5.01%5.49%7.67%-10.32%-2.09%5.51%8.91%2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CRED.AX and PLUS.AX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2018

0.68

The correlation between CRED.AX and PLUS.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF

Return for Risk

CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CRED.AX
CRED.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CRED.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRED.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRED.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CRED.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRED.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
PLUS.AX
PLUS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PLUS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLUS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLUS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PLUS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLUS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (CRED.AX) and VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF (PLUS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CRED.AXPLUS.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.29
0.47

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.44
0.70

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

0.45

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

0.96

-0.51

CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRED.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the PLUS.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRED.AX and PLUS.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRED.AX drawdown since its inception was -21.76%, which is greater than PLUS.AX's maximum drawdown of -16.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRED.AX and PLUS.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CRED.AXPLUS.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.76%

-16.54%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.54%

-3.81%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.54%

-3.81%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-16.54%

-5.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-0.83%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-3.57%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

1.82%

+1.05%

Volatility

CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (CRED.AX) has a higher volatility of 0.90% compared to VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF (PLUS.AX) at 0.76%. This indicates that CRED.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLUS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CRED.AXPLUS.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

0.76%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.70%

2.72%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

3.63%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

5.28%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

6.90%

-0.69%

Dividends

CRED.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Dividend Comparison

CRED.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than PLUS.AX's 3.68% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRED.AX
Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF		3.93%4.49%4.01%4.53%3.53%5.14%4.29%3.35%1.82%0.00%
PLUS.AX
VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF		3.68%4.15%3.44%2.99%3.06%2.20%2.42%3.41%2.57%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

CRED.AX and PLUS.AX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRED.AX tracks Solactive Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond Select TR Index, while PLUS.AX tracks VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and VanEck.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRED.AX and PLUS.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer