PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDOX vs. NHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRDOX vs. NHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRDOX vs. NHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
-1.45%7.48%8.69%8.06%-10.62%2.66%1.71%
NHS
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
-9.47%14.81%11.04%6.12%-22.99%15.78%2.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDOX achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly higher than NHS's -9.47% return.


CRDOX

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
0.10%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*

NHS

1D
0.15%
1M
-14.94%
YTD
-9.47%
6M
-6.82%
1Y
-1.78%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
-0.76%
10Y*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRDOX vs. NHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDOX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NHS's 4.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CRDOX vs. NHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDOX
CRDOX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CRDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

NHS
NHS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDOX vs. NHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRDOXNHSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

-0.11

+2.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

-0.04

+2.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

0.99

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

-0.09

+1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.08

-0.41

+8.49

CRDOX vs. NHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the NHS Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDOX and NHS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRDOXNHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

-0.11

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

-0.05

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.35

+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between CRDOX and NHS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CRDOX vs. NHS - Dividend Comparison

CRDOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, less than NHS's 16.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
6.34%5.18%6.96%6.86%5.82%2.73%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NHS
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund
16.73%14.60%14.50%13.94%12.75%8.74%9.29%7.99%8.37%7.59%8.23%9.81%

Drawdowns

CRDOX vs. NHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDOX drawdown since its inception was -15.92%, smaller than the maximum NHS drawdown of -64.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDOX and NHS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDOXNHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.92%

-64.67%

+48.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-17.43%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.92%

-37.43%

+21.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-14.94%

+12.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-8.82%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

4.00%

-3.30%

Volatility

CRDOX vs. NHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) is 1.44%, while Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that CRDOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRDOXNHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

6.23%

-4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

10.99%

-8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28%

16.02%

-12.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.11%

16.17%

-12.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.04%

16.67%

-12.63%