CRDOX vs. CCLFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRDOX (Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund) and CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, CRDOX returned 3.25%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for CCLFX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRDOX charges 0.29%/yr vs 3.42%/yr for CCLFX.

Performance

CRDOX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDOX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 2.33% return.

CRDOX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.60%
• 1Y: 8.26%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: 3.25%
• 10Y*: —

CCLFX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.93%
• 1Y: 7.37%
• 3Y*: 10.57%
• 5Y*: 8.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDOX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRDOX Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund	1.92%	7.48%	8.69%	8.06%	-10.62%	2.66%	1.71%
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund	2.33%	8.93%	12.62%	12.66%	2.32%	10.38%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDOX and CCLFX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020	0.13

The correlation between CRDOX and CCLFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CRDOX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDOX

CRDOX Risk / Return Rank: 83
CRDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CRDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CRDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CRDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
CRDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

CCLFX

CCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 100
CCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDOX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRDOX	CCLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	8.50	-5.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.74	20.12	-15.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	7.24	-5.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	39.22	-36.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.03	215.60	-201.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRDOX vs. CCLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is lower than the CCLFX Sharpe Ratio of 8.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDOX and CCLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRDOX	CCLFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.94	8.50	-5.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	5.10	-4.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	4.57	-3.72

Drawdowns

CRDOX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDOX drawdown since its inception was -15.92%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDOX and CCLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRDOX	CCLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.92%	-3.91%	-12.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-0.19%	-2.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.66%	-0.46%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.92%	-2.25%	-13.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-0.16%	-3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	0.03%	+0.58%

Volatility

CRDOX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.25%. This indicates that CRDOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRDOX	CCLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	0.25%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.46%	0.65%	+1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83%	0.88%	+1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.15%	1.73%	+2.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.03%	1.88%	+2.15%

CRDOX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDOX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRDOX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison

CRDOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, less than CCLFX's 10.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund	10.28%	10.47%	11.27%	10.96%	3.96%	7.03%	6.90%	0.61%
CRDOX Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund	6.62%	5.18%	6.96%	6.86%	5.82%	2.73%	0.33%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRDOX and CCLFX in my portfolio?

CRDOX and CCLFX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRDOX or CCLFX?

CRDOX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to CCLFX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDOX dropped -15.92% vs CCLFX's -3.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.50 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.