CRAK vs. GOOY
CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index, while GOOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. CRAK is passively managed, while GOOY is actively managed. Over the past year, CRAK returned 50.69% vs 84.81% for GOOY. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRAK charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOY.
Performance
CRAK vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRAK achieves a 25.47% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 16.01% return.
CRAK
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 25.47%
- 6M
- 21.62%
- 1Y
- 50.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
GOOY
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- 16.01%
- 6M
- 17.06%
- 1Y
- 84.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRAK vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 25.47% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 9.38% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 16.01% | 53.95% | 12.58% | -3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRAK and GOOY is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2023 | 0.18 |
The correlation between CRAK and GOOY shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRAK vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank
CRAK
GOOY
CRAK vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRAK | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.62 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.41 | 5.28 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.53 | 19.35 | -3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRAK vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRAK drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, which is greater than GOOY's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAK and GOOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRAK | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.80% | -24.40% | -34.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -16.15% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.41% | -6.68% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.47% | -6.27% | -6.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 4.40% | -1.13% |
Volatility
CRAK vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) have volatilities of 6.48% and 6.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRAK | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 6.60% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 17.31% | -2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.94% | 23.39% | -4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 23.30% | -2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 23.30% | -1.12% |
CRAK vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRAK has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRAK vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison
CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than GOOY's 48.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.61% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 48.88% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRAK and GOOY have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOY has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to CRAK (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRAK dropped -58.80% vs GOOY's -24.40%.
On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 84.81% vs 50.69% for CRAK. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 84.81% return vs 50.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 48.88%, compared with 1.61% for CRAK.
CRAK is categorized as Energy Equities, while GOOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for CRAK and 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRAK and GOOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer