CPXR vs. OILU.TO
CPXR (USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF) and OILU.TO (SavvyLong Geared Crude Oil ETF) are both Leveraged Commodities funds - CPXR tracks the SummerHaven Copper Index while OILU.TO tracks the Solactive Crude Oil Rolling Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CPXR returned 37.97% vs 213.73% for OILU.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. CPXR charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for OILU.TO.
Performance
CPXR vs. OILU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CPXR is traded in USD, while OILU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the OILU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPXR achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly lower than OILU.TO's 251.76% return.
CPXR
- 1D
- -5.10%
- 1M
- 21.98%
- YTD
- 21.61%
- 6M
- 34.31%
- 1Y
- 37.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILU.TO
- 1D
- 5.10%
- 1M
- -12.12%
- YTD
- 251.76%
- 6M
- 231.87%
- 1Y
- 213.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPXR vs. OILU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF | 21.61% | 36.03% |
OILU.TO SavvyLong Geared Crude Oil ETF | 251.76% | -37.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPXR and OILU.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPXR vs. OILU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CPXR
OILU.TO
CPXR vs. OILU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and SavvyLong Geared Crude Oil ETF (OILU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPXR | OILU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 5.31 | -4.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | 9.24 | -7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPXR | OILU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 2.42 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.20 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
CPXR vs. OILU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPXR drawdown since its inception was -47.87%, roughly equal to the maximum OILU.TO drawdown of -46.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXR and OILU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPXR | OILU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.87% | -46.99% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.87% | -40.52% | -7.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.10% | -16.84% | +11.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -25.46% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.94% | 23.23% | +2.71% |
Volatility
CPXR vs. OILU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) is 18.75%, while SavvyLong Geared Crude Oil ETF (OILU.TO) has a volatility of 33.84%. This indicates that CPXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPXR | OILU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.75% | 33.84% | -15.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.26% | 79.05% | -33.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.77% | 88.89% | -20.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 81.18% | -12.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 81.18% | -12.57% |
CPXR vs. OILU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPXR has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than OILU.TO's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPXR vs. OILU.TO - Dividend Comparison
CPXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while OILU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF | 0.58% | 0.70% |
OILU.TO SavvyLong Geared Crude Oil ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPXR and OILU.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CPXR is cheaper at 1.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CPXR is cheaper with a 1.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for OILU.TO.
CPXR tracks SummerHaven Copper Index, while OILU.TO tracks Solactive Crude Oil Rolling Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF and LongPoint. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for CPXR and 1.25% for OILU.TO.
Find the right allocation for CPXR and OILU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer