PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CPXJ.L is traded in USD, while IS3Q.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IS3Q.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CPXJ.L having a 8.57% return and IS3Q.DE slightly lower at 8.21%. Over the past 10 years, CPXJ.L has underperformed IS3Q.DE with an annualized return of 7.73%, while IS3Q.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.


CPXJ.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
8.57%
6M
10.28%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
7.73%

IS3Q.DE

1D
0.88%
1M
3.52%
YTD
8.21%
6M
9.80%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPXJ.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
8.57%20.05%5.35%5.87%-5.98%4.27%6.80%18.07%-10.71%26.08%
IS3Q.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.21%16.05%16.71%25.55%-19.53%23.69%14.65%31.07%-7.99%23.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CPXJ.L and IS3Q.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014

0.69

The correlation between CPXJ.L and IS3Q.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXJ.L
CPXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3Q.DE
IS3Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPXJ.LIS3Q.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.39

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

10.04

-4.11

CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXJ.L and IS3Q.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPXJ.LIS3Q.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.83

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.66

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.78

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.71

-0.38

Drawdowns

CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than IS3Q.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXJ.L and IS3Q.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPXJ.LIS3Q.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.92%

-32.79%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-8.70%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.25%

-16.89%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-27.71%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.92%

-32.79%

-6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-0.38%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-4.62%

-3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.08%

+0.64%

Volatility

CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) at 2.61%. This indicates that CPXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3Q.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPXJ.LIS3Q.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

2.61%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

8.44%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

11.38%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

15.43%

+1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

15.61%

+2.42%

CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXJ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3Q.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPXJ.L vs. IS3Q.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPXJ.L nor IS3Q.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CPXJ.L and IS3Q.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPXJ.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IS3Q.DE.

CPXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IS3Q.DE is Global Equities. CPXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while IS3Q.DE tracks MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPXJ.L and 0.30% for IS3Q.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPXJ.L and IS3Q.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer