PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CPXJ.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) and HKOR.L (HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CPXJ.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while HKOR.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CPXJ.L returned 7.73%/yr vs 17.11%/yr for HKOR.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPXJ.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HKOR.L.

Performance

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CPXJ.L is traded in USD, while HKOR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HKOR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPXJ.L achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than HKOR.L's 106.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CPXJ.L has underperformed HKOR.L with an annualized return of 7.73%, while HKOR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.11% annualized return.

CPXJ.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
8.57%
6M
10.28%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
7.73%

HKOR.L

1D
-4.83%
1M
16.29%
YTD
106.88%
6M
127.67%
1Y
234.77%
3Y*
48.94%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
17.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPXJ.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc		8.57%20.05%5.35%5.87%-5.98%4.27%6.80%18.07%-10.71%26.08%
HKOR.L
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD		106.88%100.49%-23.11%19.44%-28.51%-8.19%44.51%11.42%-21.21%45.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CPXJ.L and HKOR.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2011

0.60

The correlation between CPXJ.L and HKOR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CPXJ.L
HKOR.L

Financial Services

45.5%
8.7%

Basic Materials

15.5%
1.7%

Industrials

8.6%
16.3%

Real Estate

7.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
6.3%

Utilities

3.6%
0.3%

Healthcare

3.2%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.2%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.1%

Energy

2.8%
0.9%

Technology

1.1%
59.7%

Financial Services

CPXJ.L
45.5%
HKOR.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

CPXJ.L
15.5%
HKOR.L
1.7%

Industrials

CPXJ.L
8.6%
HKOR.L
16.3%

Real Estate

CPXJ.L
7.9%
HKOR.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

CPXJ.L
6.1%
HKOR.L
6.3%

Utilities

CPXJ.L
3.6%
HKOR.L
0.3%

Healthcare

CPXJ.L
3.2%
HKOR.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

CPXJ.L
2.9%
HKOR.L
1.2%

Communication Services

CPXJ.L
2.9%
HKOR.L
2.1%

Energy

CPXJ.L
2.8%
HKOR.L
0.9%

Technology

CPXJ.L
1.1%
HKOR.L
59.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc

HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD

Often compared with CPXJ.L:
CPXJ.L vs. CEMAT.COCPXJ.L vs. VFEA.DECPXJ.L vs. IWDA.LCPXJ.L vs. VUAA.LCPXJ.L vs. QTOPCPXJ.L vs. IJPN.LCPXJ.L vs. DRIV
Often compared with HKOR.L:
HKOR.L vs. HTWN.LHKOR.L vs. AUAD.LHKOR.L vs. XMID.LHKOR.L vs. FRXT.LHKOR.L vs. GXLK.LHKOR.L vs. KRWL.LHKOR.L vs. LAUU.L

Return for Risk

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CPXJ.L
CPXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
HKOR.L
HKOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HKOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CPXJ.LHKOR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.20
6.02

-4.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.87
5.59

-3.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.78

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

10.23

-8.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

38.19

-32.26

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the HKOR.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXJ.L and HKOR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CPXJ.LHKOR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

6.02

-4.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.68

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.66

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.41

-0.08

Drawdowns

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, smaller than the maximum HKOR.L drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXJ.L and HKOR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CPXJ.LHKOR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.92%

-50.56%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-22.80%

+14.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.25%

-29.50%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-48.74%

+23.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.92%

-50.56%

+11.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-5.69%

+2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-18.96%

+10.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

6.12%

-3.40%

Volatility

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPXJ.L) is 4.55%, while HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) has a volatility of 18.48%. This indicates that CPXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CPXJ.LHKOR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

18.48%

-13.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

33.67%

-22.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

38.79%

-25.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

27.58%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

25.83%

-7.80%

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXJ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HKOR.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPXJ.L vs. HKOR.L - Dividend Comparison

CPXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPXJ.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HKOR.L
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD		0.35%0.69%1.51%1.11%0.71%0.59%0.02%0.29%0.53%0.11%0.13%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

CPXJ.L and HKOR.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPXJ.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOR.L.

CPXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while HKOR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPXJ.L and 0.50% for HKOR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPXJ.L and HKOR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer