CPTL vs. RSSY

Last updated Jul 23, 2026

CPTL (Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF) and RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CPTL is passively managed, while RSSY is actively managed. CPTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSSY.

Performance

CPTL vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CPTL

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

RSSY

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 31.42%
• YTD: 31.88%
• 1Y: 36.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CPTL Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF	$950.92K	$950.92K	$950.92K
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	$599.63K	$667.42K	$702.49K

CPTL vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CPTL Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF	-0.24%
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	-0.39%

Return for Risk

CPTL vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPTL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSSY

RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 92
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPTL vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPTL	RSSY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.64	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.57	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.36	—

Drawdowns

CPTL vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPTL drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPTL and RSSY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPTL	RSSY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-29.57%	+29.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-1.52%	+1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-6.99%	+6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CPTL	RSSY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.80%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	18.13%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.13%	—

CPTL vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPTL vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

CPTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.

Position	TTM	2025
CPTL Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	1.54%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CPTL or RSSY?

On fees, CPTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPTL or RSSY?

CPTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPTL or RSSY?

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for CPTL.

What is the main difference between CPTL and RSSY?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CPTL and 1.04% for RSSY.