PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPSU vs. DIVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPSU vs. DIVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSU achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than DIVG's 10.58% return.


CPSU

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.84%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVG

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.59%
YTD
10.58%
6M
10.78%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSU vs. DIVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPSU and DIVG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPSU vs. DIVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSU
CPSU Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CPSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSU Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVG
DIVG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DIVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSU vs. DIVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSUDIVGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.97

1.34

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.29

4.10

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

42.62

13.12

+29.50

CPSU vs. DIVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSU Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the DIVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSU and DIVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPSUDIVGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76

1.97

+1.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.81

1.39

+2.41

Drawdowns

CPSU vs. DIVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSU drawdown since its inception was -1.03%, smaller than the maximum DIVG drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSU and DIVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSUDIVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.03%

-14.95%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.03%

-5.13%

+4.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.20%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.07%

-2.29%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.15%

1.60%

-1.45%

Volatility

CPSU vs. DIVG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU) is 0.29%, while Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that CPSU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPSUDIVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

2.53%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.39%

7.33%

-5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72%

10.66%

-8.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.72%

13.19%

-11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.72%

13.19%

-11.47%

CPSU vs. DIVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSU has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVG's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPSU vs. DIVG - Dividend Comparison

CPSU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPSU and DIVG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVG has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to CPSU (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSU dropped -1.03% vs DIVG's -14.95%.

On 1-year performance, DIVG leads with 20.94% vs 6.43% for CPSU. On fees, DIVG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CPSU has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVG has performed better with a 20.94% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSU.

DIVG has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.00% for CPSU.

CPSU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DIVG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPSU and 0.39% for DIVG.

CPSU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPSU and DIVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer