PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPSP vs. CPSU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPSP vs. CPSU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSP achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than CPSU's 2.29% return.


CPSP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.74%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPSU

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.84%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSP vs. CPSU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPSP and CPSU is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.70

The correlation between CPSP and CPSU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPSP vs. CPSU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSP
CPSP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CPSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSP Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSU
CPSU Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CPSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSU Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSP vs. CPSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSPCPSUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.31

1.97

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.11

6.29

+12.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

96.35

42.62

+53.73

CPSP vs. CPSU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSP Sharpe Ratio is 5.08, which is higher than the CPSU Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSP and CPSU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPSPCPSUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.08

3.76

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.17

3.81

-0.64

Drawdowns

CPSP vs. CPSU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSP drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, which is greater than CPSU's maximum drawdown of -1.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSP and CPSU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSPCPSUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-1.03%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.37%

-1.03%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.07%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.15%

-0.08%

Volatility

CPSP vs. CPSU - Volatility Comparison

Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) has a higher volatility of 0.32% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU) at 0.29%. This indicates that CPSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPSPCPSUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

0.29%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

1.39%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42%

1.72%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

1.72%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.37%

1.72%

+0.65%

CPSP vs. CPSU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPSP and CPSU have an expense ratio of 0.69%.


Dividends

CPSP vs. CPSU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPSP nor CPSU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CPSP and CPSU have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPSP has higher volatility (0.32%) compared to CPSU (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSP dropped -1.73% vs CPSU's -1.03%.

On 1-year performance, CPSP leads with 7.13% vs 6.43% for CPSU. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CPSP has performed better with a 7.13% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPSP and CPSU have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

CPSP and CPSU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CPSP is categorized as S&P 500, while CPSU is Defined Outcome.

CPSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 3.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPSP and CPSU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer