PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPSO vs. CPSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPSO vs. CPSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPSO) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CPSO having a 2.72% return and CPSA slightly higher at 2.81%.


CPSO

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.96%
YTD
2.72%
6M
3.00%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPSA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.81%
6M
3.15%
1Y
8.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSO vs. CPSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPSO and CPSA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.85

The correlation between CPSO and CPSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPSO vs. CPSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSO
CPSO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CPSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSA
CPSA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CPSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSA Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSO vs. CPSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPSO) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSOCPSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.78

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

5.52

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.43

31.36

-5.93

CPSO vs. CPSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSO Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is comparable to the CPSA Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSO and CPSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPSOCPSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42

3.53

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.96

1.84

+0.12

Drawdowns

CPSO vs. CPSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSO drawdown since its inception was -3.23%, smaller than the maximum CPSA drawdown of -4.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSO and CPSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSOCPSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-4.72%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-1.47%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-0.38%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

0.26%

+0.03%

Volatility

CPSO vs. CPSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPSO) is 0.33%, while Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA) has a volatility of 0.41%. This indicates that CPSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPSOCPSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

0.41%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

1.73%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14%

2.33%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

4.14%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.02%

4.14%

-1.12%

CPSO vs. CPSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPSO and CPSA have an expense ratio of 0.69%.


Dividends

CPSO vs. CPSA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPSO nor CPSA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CPSO and CPSA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPSA has higher volatility (0.41%) compared to CPSO (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSO dropped -3.23% vs CPSA's -4.72%.

On 1-year performance, CPSA leads with 8.10% vs 7.29% for CPSO. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CPSA has performed better with a 8.10% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPSO and CPSA have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

CPSO and CPSA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CPSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 3.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPSO and CPSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer