PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CPSM vs. FNILX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CPSMFNILX
Daily Std Dev2.84%12.44%
Max Drawdown-1.16%-33.75%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CPSM and FNILX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CPSM vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.14%
16.08%
CPSM
FNILX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CPSM vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSM has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


CPSM
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May
Expense ratio chart for CPSM: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%
Expense ratio chart for FNILX: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPSM vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSM
Sharpe ratio
No data
FNILX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNILX, currently valued at 3.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNILX, currently valued at 4.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FNILX, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.61
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNILX, currently valued at 4.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FNILX, currently valued at 21.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0021.54

CPSM vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

CPSM vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

CPSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


TTM202320222021202020192018
CPSM
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
1.05%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.41%

Drawdowns

CPSM vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSM drawdown since its inception was -1.16%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSM and FNILX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
CPSM
FNILX

Volatility

CPSM vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM) is 0.75%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that CPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.75%
3.94%
CPSM
FNILX