CPSJ vs. CBTJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CPSJ (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July) and CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - CPSJ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MerQube Cap Protect US Lrg Cap PR Index - Jul, while CBTJ is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Calamos. CPSJ is passively managed, while CBTJ is actively managed. Over the past year, CPSJ returned 7.54% vs -30.36% for CBTJ. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CPSJ vs. CBTJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPSJ) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSJ achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than CBTJ's -16.58% return.

CPSJ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 2.98%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBTJ

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -10.52%
• YTD: -16.58%
• 6M: -22.65%
• 1Y: -30.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSJ vs. CBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPSJ Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	2.61%	6.39%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-16.58%	-11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CPSJ and CBTJ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

CPSJ vs. CBTJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSJ

CPSJ Risk / Return Rank: 94
CPSJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CPSJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CPSJ Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CPSJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CPSJ Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CBTJ

CBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSJ vs. CBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPSJ) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPSJ	CBTJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.30	-1.12	+4.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.44	-1.59	+7.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	0.82	+0.94
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.47	-0.78	+6.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.62	-1.29	+31.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPSJ vs. CBTJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the CBTJ Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSJ and CBTJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPSJ	CBTJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30	-1.12	+4.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	-0.80	+2.43

Drawdowns

CPSJ vs. CBTJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSJ drawdown since its inception was -5.36%, smaller than the maximum CBTJ drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSJ and CBTJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPSJ	CBTJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.36%	-39.12%	+33.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.38%	-39.12%	+37.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-39.12%	+39.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.45%	-15.13%	+14.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	23.62%	-23.37%

Volatility

CPSJ vs. CBTJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPSJ) is 0.33%, while Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that CPSJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPSJ	CBTJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	4.87%	-4.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.67%	19.34%	-17.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32%	27.13%	-24.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.59%	25.64%	-21.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.59%	25.64%	-21.05%

CPSJ vs. CBTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPSJ and CBTJ have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CPSJ vs. CBTJ - Dividend Comparison

CPSJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.

Position	TTM	2025
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	1.74%	1.45%
CPSJ Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPSJ and CBTJ in my portfolio?

CPSJ and CBTJ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPSJ or CBTJ?

CBTJ has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to CPSJ (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSJ dropped -5.36% vs CBTJ's -39.12%.

Which ETF is better, CPSJ or CBTJ?

On 1-year performance, CPSJ leads with 7.54% vs -30.36% for CBTJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CPSJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPSJ or CBTJ?

Over the 1-year period, CPSJ has performed better with a 7.54% return vs -30.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPSJ or CBTJ?

CPSJ and CBTJ have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPSJ or CBTJ?

CBTJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for CPSJ.

What is the main difference between CPSJ and CBTJ?

CPSJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CBTJ is Blockchain.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPSJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.