CPSD vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CPSD (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPSD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). CPSD is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, CPSD returned 7.82% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.40 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CPSD charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

CPSD vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSD achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.

CPSD

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.59%
• 6M: 2.78%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 1Y: 7.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.56%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 32.41%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 1Y: 98.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -42.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December	$34.67K	$28.28K	$36.02K
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$29.57M	$32.71M	$46.48M

CPSD vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December	3.20%	7.63%	0.04%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	39.44%	-25.11%	2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CPSD and SBIT is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024	-0.40

Return for Risk

CPSD vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPSD

CPSD Risk / Return Rank: 95
CPSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CPSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CPSD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CPSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CPSD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPSD vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPSD	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	1.27	+1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	1.95	+2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.23	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.96	2.35	+2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.46	5.19	+19.28

CPSD vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSD and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPSD vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSD drawdown since its inception was -3.45%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSD and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPSD	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	-91.35%	+87.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.49%	-47.94%	+46.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-77.87%	+77.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-69.07%	+68.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	21.67%	-21.37%

Volatility

CPSD vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) is 0.67%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that CPSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPSD	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	18.09%	-17.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.70%	67.10%	-65.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79%	88.65%	-85.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.31%	96.10%	-92.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.31%	96.10%	-92.79%

CPSD vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSD has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPSD vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

CPSD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.03%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPSD and SBIT in my portfolio?

CPSD and SBIT have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPSD or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to CPSD (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSD dropped -3.45% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, CPSD or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 7.82% for CPSD. On fees, CPSD is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPSD or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPSD or SBIT?

CPSD is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPSD or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.00% for CPSD.

What is the main difference between CPSD and SBIT?

CPSD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPSD and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.