CPRO vs. KAPR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CPRO (Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) and KAPR (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. CPRO is actively managed, while KAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, CPRO returned 13.53% vs 24.25% for KAPR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CPRO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KAPR.

Performance

CPRO vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPRO) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPRO achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 12.76% return.

CPRO

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 4.39%
• 6M: 4.04%
• 1Y: 13.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KAPR

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 12.76%
• 6M: 12.47%
• 1Y: 24.25%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: 7.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPRO vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CPRO Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	4.39%	8.34%	0.22%
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April	12.76%	7.42%	0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CPRO and KAPR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.85

The correlation between CPRO and KAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CPRO vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPRO

CPRO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

KAPR

KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPRO vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPRO) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPRO	KAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	3.65	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.55	5.66	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.77	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.68	9.68	-2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.45	45.44	-16.98

CPRO vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPRO Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the KAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPRO and KAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPRO vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRO drawdown since its inception was -3.36%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRO and KAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPRO	KAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-16.91%	+13.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.77%	-2.52%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.69%	-3.89%	+3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.54%	-0.06%

Volatility

CPRO vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPRO) is 0.77%, while Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that CPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPRO	KAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	2.50%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.12%	4.56%	-2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.49%	6.70%	-2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.13%	11.76%	-7.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.13%	11.65%	-7.52%

CPRO vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPRO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPRO vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPRO nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPRO and KAPR in my portfolio?

CPRO and KAPR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPRO or KAPR?

KAPR has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to CPRO (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRO dropped -3.36% vs KAPR's -16.91%.

Which ETF is better, CPRO or KAPR?

On 1-year performance, KAPR leads with 24.25% vs 13.53% for CPRO. On fees, CPRO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPRO has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPRO or KAPR?

Over the 1-year period, KAPR has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPRO or KAPR?

CPRO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPRO or KAPR?

CPRO and KAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CPRO and KAPR?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPRO and 0.79% for KAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 3.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.