CPRO vs. DMAX

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CPRO (Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) and DMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. CPRO is actively managed, while DMAX is passively managed. Over the past year, CPRO returned 11.84% vs 7.24% for DMAX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPRO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DMAX.

Performance

CPRO vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPRO) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPRO achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly higher than DMAX's 2.85% return.

CPRO

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 3.64%
• YTD: 4.63%
• 1Y: 11.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DMAX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: 2.62%
• YTD: 2.85%
• 1Y: 7.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPRO vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPRO Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	4.63%	8.34%
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF	2.85%	7.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CPRO and DMAX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.64

The correlation between CPRO and DMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CPRO vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPRO

CPRO Risk / Return Rank: 95
CPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

DMAX

DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 95
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPRO vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPRO) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPRO	DMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	3.15	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.88	4.79	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.66	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.46	5.11	+1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.19	25.22	-1.03

CPRO vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPRO and DMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPRO vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRO drawdown since its inception was -3.36%, roughly equal to the maximum DMAX drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRO and DMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPRO	DMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-3.37%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.77%	-1.41%	-0.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	0.00%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.68%	-0.37%	-0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	0.29%	+0.18%

Volatility

CPRO vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPRO) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) have volatilities of 0.63% and 0.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPRO	DMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.63%	0.64%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.10%	1.65%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.35%	2.29%	+2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.08%	3.34%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	3.34%	+0.74%

CPRO vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPRO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPRO vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

CPRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.

Position	TTM	2025
CPRO Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF	1.15%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPRO and DMAX in my portfolio?

CPRO and DMAX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPRO or DMAX?

DMAX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to CPRO (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRO dropped -3.36% vs DMAX's -3.37%.

Which ETF is better, CPRO or DMAX?

On 1-year performance, CPRO leads with 11.84% vs 7.24% for DMAX. On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPRO or DMAX?

Over the 1-year period, CPRO has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 7.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPRO or DMAX?

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPRO or DMAX?

DMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for CPRO.

What is the main difference between CPRO and DMAX?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPRO and 0.50% for DMAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.