CPRI vs. LULU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).

Performance

CPRI vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CPRI vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPRI Capri Holdings Limited	-27.79%	15.86%	-58.08%	-12.35%	-11.69%	54.55%	10.09%	0.61%	-39.76%	46.46%
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	-26.33%	-45.66%	-25.21%	59.59%	-18.16%	12.48%	50.23%	90.50%	54.74%	20.93%

Fundamentals

EPS CPRI : -$4.71 LULU : $14.54
PS Ratio CPRI : 0.57 LULU : 1.65
Total Revenue (TTM) CPRI : $3.71B LULU : $11.07B
Gross Profit (TTM) CPRI : $2.28B LULU : $6.47B
EBITDA (TTM) CPRI : $143.00M LULU : $2.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPRI achieves a -27.79% return, which is significantly lower than LULU's -26.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CPRI has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of -11.07%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.

CPRI

• 1D: 4.94%
• 1M: -14.09%
• YTD: -27.79%
• 6M: -11.55%
• 1Y: -10.69%
• 3Y*: -27.89%
• 5Y*: -18.63%
• 10Y*: -11.07%

LULU

• 1D: 4.99%
• 1M: -17.32%
• YTD: -26.33%
• 6M: -13.95%
• 1Y: -45.91%
• 3Y*: -25.09%
• 5Y*: -12.65%
• 10Y*: 8.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CPRI vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPRI

CPRI Risk / Return Rank: 33
CPRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CPRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CPRI Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CPRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CPRI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

LULU

LULU Risk / Return Rank: 10
LULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
LULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
LULU Omega Ratio Rank: 8
LULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LULU Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPRI vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPRI	LULU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	-0.94	+0.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.21	-1.24	+1.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.83	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	-0.85	+0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.81	-1.21	+0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPRI vs. LULU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPRI Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPRI and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPRI	LULU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	-0.94	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	-0.31	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.19	0.21	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.28	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between CPRI and LULU is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CPRI vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPRI nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CPRI vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRI drawdown since its inception was -92.47%, roughly equal to the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRI and LULU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPRI	LULU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.47%	-92.26%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.30%	-56.49%	+17.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.36%	-71.48%	-10.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.03%	-71.48%	-18.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.35%	-70.06%	-12.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.08%	-27.12%	-19.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.21%	39.42%	-23.21%

Volatility

CPRI vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 10.18%. This indicates that CPRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPRI	LULU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.22%	10.18%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.80%	28.24%	+4.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.62%	49.04%	+15.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.34%	41.46%	+17.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.51%	40.18%	+18.33%

Financials

CPRI vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Capri Holdings Limited and Lululemon Athletica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CPRI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capri Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 623.00M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.8%.

LULU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.43B and revenue of 2.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.

CPRI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capri Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 46.00M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

LULU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 444.69M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

CPRI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capri Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

LULU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 306.84M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.