PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPRA vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPRA vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPRA) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPRA achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 56.61% return.


CPRA

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.04%
YTD
3.53%
6M
4.01%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USOY

1D
-1.67%
1M
1.06%
YTD
56.61%
6M
52.27%
1Y
51.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPRA vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPRA and USOY is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPRA vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPRA
CPRA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CPRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPRA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CPRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPRA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPRA vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPRA) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPRAUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.92

1.32

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.31

3.65

+6.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

52.75

6.98

+45.77

CPRA vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPRA Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPRA and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPRAUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96

1.71

+2.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.19

0.91

+2.29

Drawdowns

CPRA vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRA drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum USOY drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRA and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPRAUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-17.46%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.89%

-14.29%

+13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-8.37%

+8.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.15%

-6.47%

+6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

7.45%

-7.28%

Volatility

CPRA vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPRA) is 0.68%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 9.70%. This indicates that CPRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPRAUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

9.70%

-9.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.26%

27.33%

-26.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32%

30.56%

-28.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.82%

26.14%

-23.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.82%

26.14%

-23.32%

CPRA vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPRA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPRA vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

CPRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.61%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPRA and USOY have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to CPRA (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRA dropped -1.69% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 51.90% vs 9.16% for CPRA. On fees, CPRA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 51.90% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPRA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 57.61%, compared with 0.00% for CPRA.

CPRA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPRA and 1.22% for USOY.

CPRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPRA and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer