CPPAX vs. FUMBX
CPPAX (American Funds Preservation Portfolio) and FUMBX (Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CPPAX returned 1.26%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for FUMBX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CPPAX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FUMBX.
Performance
CPPAX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPPAX achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than FUMBX's -0.11% return.
CPPAX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- 2.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
FUMBX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- —
CPPAX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPPAX American Funds Preservation Portfolio | -0.31% | 5.51% | 3.66% | 4.09% | -6.14% | -0.62% | 5.84% | 3.92% | 0.89% | -0.40% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | -0.11% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPPAX and FUMBX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between CPPAX and FUMBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPPAX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank
CPPAX
FUMBX
CPPAX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Preservation Portfolio (CPPAX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPPAX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.89 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 5.55 | -1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPPAX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPPAX drawdown since its inception was -8.59%, roughly equal to the maximum FUMBX drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPPAX and FUMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPPAX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -8.83% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.67% | -1.54% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.67% | -1.57% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.57% | -8.60% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.06% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -1.85% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.52% | +0.05% |
Volatility
CPPAX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Preservation Portfolio (CPPAX) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) at 0.70%. This indicates that CPPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPPAX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.70% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 1.56% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09% | 2.08% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 2.93% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.49% | 2.49% | 0.00% |
CPPAX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPPAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPPAX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison
CPPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than FUMBX's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPPAX American Funds Preservation Portfolio | 3.50% | 3.56% | 4.03% | 3.24% | 2.02% | 0.95% | 2.32% | 1.91% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.26% | 1.11% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.77% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPPAX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPPAX has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to FUMBX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPPAX dropped -8.59% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.
FUMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPPAX and FUMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer