PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPNQ vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPNQ vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPNQ) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPNQ achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


CPNQ

1D
0.03%
1M
1.03%
YTD
3.12%
6M
3.32%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPNQ vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPNQ and USOY is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

-0.10

The correlation between CPNQ and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPNQ vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPNQ
CPNQ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CPNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CPNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPNQ vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPNQ) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPNQUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.35

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.89

4.03

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.34

7.74

+21.60

CPNQ vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPNQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is higher than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPNQ and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPNQUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

1.89

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

0.99

+1.25

Drawdowns

CPNQ vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPNQ drawdown since its inception was -3.52%, smaller than the maximum USOY drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPNQ and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPNQUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-17.46%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.52%

-14.29%

+12.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-5.11%

+5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.43%

-6.47%

+6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

7.42%

-7.12%

Volatility

CPNQ vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPNQ) is 0.47%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that CPNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPNQUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

11.62%

-11.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

27.18%

-25.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64%

30.44%

-27.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.37%

26.13%

-22.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.37%

26.13%

-22.76%

CPNQ vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPNQ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPNQ vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

CPNQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.16%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPNQ and USOY have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to CPNQ (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPNQ dropped -3.52% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 57.29% vs 8.88% for CPNQ. On fees, CPNQ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPNQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 57.29% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPNQ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 0.00% for CPNQ.

CPNQ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPNQ and 1.22% for USOY.

CPNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPNQ and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer