CPLS vs. VBND
CPLS (AB Core Plus Bond ETF) and VBND (Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. CPLS is actively managed, while VBND is passively managed. Over the past year, CPLS returned 5.29% vs 6.14% for VBND. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CPLS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for VBND.
Performance
CPLS vs. VBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CPLS having a 0.53% return and VBND slightly higher at 0.55%.
CPLS
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VBND
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
CPLS vs. VBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.53% | 6.91% | 1.65% | 1.21% |
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 0.55% | 7.31% | 1.26% | 1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPLS and VBND is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between CPLS and VBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPLS vs. VBND — Risk / Return Rank
CPLS
VBND
CPLS vs. VBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPLS | VBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 2.14 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.01 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 5.43 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPLS | VBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.32 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
CPLS vs. VBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum VBND drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLS and VBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPLS | VBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -18.97% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.47% | -2.82% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.71% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -4.21% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 1.05% | -0.27% |
Volatility
CPLS vs. VBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) is 1.42%, while Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that CPLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPLS | VBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.51% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 2.94% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 4.39% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 6.12% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 5.45% | -0.63% |
CPLS vs. VBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPLS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than VBND's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPLS vs. VBND - Dividend Comparison
CPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than VBND's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.61% | 4.66% | 4.71% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 4.22% | 4.22% | 4.41% | 3.88% | 2.55% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 2.82% | 2.00% | 3.12% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPLS and VBND have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBND has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to CPLS (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLS dropped -4.43% vs VBND's -18.97%.
On 1-year performance, VBND leads with 6.14% vs 5.29% for CPLS. On fees, CPLS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VBND has performed better with a 6.14% return vs 5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CPLS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for VBND.
CPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 4.22% for VBND.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Vident. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CPLS and 0.41% for VBND.
VBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPLS and VBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer