PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPLS vs. HYFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPLS vs. HYFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPLS achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than HYFI's 2.20% return.


CPLS

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.48%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYFI

1D
0.11%
1M
0.54%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.79%
1Y
8.38%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPLS vs. HYFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CPLS
AB Core Plus Bond ETF
0.53%6.91%1.65%1.21%
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
2.20%8.91%7.98%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CPLS and HYFI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

0.59

The correlation between CPLS and HYFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPLS vs. HYFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPLS
CPLS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HYFI
HYFI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HYFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPLS vs. HYFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPLSHYFIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

2.13

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

3.31

-1.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.27

-1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.52

14.76

-8.24

CPLS vs. HYFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the HYFI Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPLS and HYFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPLSHYFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.13

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.72

-0.85

Drawdowns

CPLS vs. HYFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum HYFI drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLS and HYFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPLSHYFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-6.34%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-2.49%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

0.00%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-0.51%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.55%

+0.23%

Volatility

CPLS vs. HYFI - Volatility Comparison

AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) at 1.09%. This indicates that CPLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPLSHYFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.09%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

3.10%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

3.95%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

5.36%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

5.36%

-0.54%

CPLS vs. HYFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPLS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than HYFI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPLS vs. HYFI - Dividend Comparison

CPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than HYFI's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPLS
AB Core Plus Bond ETF
4.61%4.66%4.71%0.23%
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
6.62%6.66%6.57%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPLS and HYFI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPLS has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to HYFI (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLS dropped -4.43% vs HYFI's -6.34%.

On 1-year performance, HYFI leads with 8.38% vs 5.29% for CPLS. On fees, CPLS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, HYFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYFI has performed better with a 8.38% return vs 5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPLS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYFI.

HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 4.61% for CPLS.

CPLS is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while HYFI is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CPLS and 0.40% for HYFI.

HYFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPLS and HYFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer